Case Overview
The plaintiff claimed building defects caused water leakage and the collapse of a temporary structure, seeking damages.
The defendant argued that standards for determining defects must differ depending on the building’s design method and structural characteristics, and successfully contested liability.

Key Strategies

• Analyzed differences in defect liability between permanent and temporary structures
• Considered design methods and structural features in assessing leakage-related defects
• Distinguished between ordinary damages and special damages in the claim

Outcome

• Full victory
• Plaintiff’s damage claim dismissed
• Complete elimination of financial and reputational risk for the client

Significance of the Case

This case demonstrates the importance of applying appropriate defect assessment standards based on design and building characteristics in construction disputes.
It highlights the value of specialized expertise and strategic defense in construction and real estate litigation.

Keywords

Building defect, damage claim, water leakage, temporary structure collapse, design method, defect assessment standard, full victory, construction dispute, success case