This case demonstrates how the firm provided legal advice from the initial drafting stage of a non-compete agreement to ensure its enforceability and later successfully enforced the agreement against a party that violated the non-compete obligations and interfered with the client’s business relationships.

Through strategic legal action, the firm ultimately facilitated resolution of the dispute on terms favorable to the client.
 

1. Case Overview

Company A sought legal advice from One Law Partners, LLC and entered into a non-compete agreement with a departing employee to protect its key business assets, including customer relationships and sales networks. The agreement also contained a contractual penalty provision.
 

Despite the agreement, the opposing party engaged in business activities targeting the client’s customers and interfered with the client’s existing business relationships, thereby violating contractual obligations.
 

As a result, Company A suffered damage arising from the loss of customer relationships and commenced legal action to hold the opposing party accountable for the breach and recover its losses.
 

2. Key Issues

The principal issues in this case were:

• The validity and enforceability of the non-compete agreement and contractual penalty provision
• The identification of the proper parties bound by the agreement

In particular, non-compete agreements may be deemed unenforceable if they excessively restrict an individual’s freedom to choose an occupation.

Likewise, contractual penalty provisions may be invalidated if deemed excessive.
 

Accordingly, a critical issue was demonstrating the necessity and reasonableness of the non-compete restrictions and the appropriateness of the agreed contractual penalty.
 

3. Legal Strategy

Attorneys Joun-woo Park, Jeong-ik Oh, and Hyun-june Kim of One Law Partners, LLC became involved at the agreement-drafting stage and provided legal advice regarding the validity and enforceability of both the non-compete obligations and the contractual penalty provisions.
 

The attorneys carefully reviewed and structured the agreement to maximize its enforceability under applicable law.
 

When actual breaches later occurred, the firm gathered evidence concerning the opposing party’s interference with customers and competitive activities and aggressively exercised the client’s rights by filing an action seeking contractual penalties and other remedies.
 

Faced with the substantial legal and practical effectiveness of the claims being asserted, the opposing party entered into negotiations with the client.
 

Ultimately, the dispute was resolved on terms favorable to the client.
 

4. Significance of the Case

This case highlights the importance of proactive legal review and careful contractual structuring when entering into non-compete agreements designed to protect a company’s key assets, including customer relationships and business networks.
 

It also demonstrates how a well-drafted agreement can function effectively when an actual dispute arises.
 

From the drafting of the non-compete agreement and contractual penalty provisions through the enforcement stage and ultimate protection of the client’s rights, One Law Partners, LLC provided comprehensive legal support throughout the entire process.
 

Accordingly, this case serves as a meaningful example of the firm’s capabilities in both contract design and commercial dispute resolution.
 

---

Attorney Joun-woo Park | jwpark@onelawpartners.com
Attorney Jeong-ik Oh | jioh@onelawpartners.com
Attorney Hyun-june Kim | hjkim2@onelawpartners.com
 

---

Public Relations Team, One Law Partners, LLC | pr@onelawpartners.com