Case Overview
A company was accused of fraudulently receiving the Youth Employment Subsidy, resulting in a deferred prosecution under the Employment Insurance Act. Such a disposition could severely impact the company’s reputation and future business operations, especially since the company was preparing for KOSDAQ listing, where any negative legal record could hinder the process.

Our firm successfully filed a constitutional complaint, leading to the cancellation of the deferred prosecution, and ultimately secured a non-prosecution decision (no charges) from the prosecution.

Key Strategies

• Analyzed the unconstitutionality and illegality of the deferred prosecution disposition
• Filed a constitutional complaint and submitted persuasive legal opinions
• Convinced the prosecution of grounds for non-prosecution during the review stage

Outcome

• Deferred prosecution canceled → Non-prosecution confirmed
• Complete elimination of legal risk and restoration of corporate reputation

Significance of the Case

This case exemplifies our firm’s expertise in criminal procedure, experience with constitutional litigation, and capability in corporate risk management, delivering the best possible outcome for our client. It stands as a representative success story in safeguarding corporate interests under complex legal challenges.

Keywords

Youth Employment Subsidy, Employment Insurance Act violation, deferred prosecution cancellation, non-prosecution, constitutional complaint, corporate risk management, criminal procedure expertise, success case